3.55 vs. 3.92 - MPG vs. Towing Ability - Page 3 - Ram 1500 Diesel Forum
 2Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #21 of 23 Old 08-31-2015, 12:59 AM
Junior Member
 
Ramvia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My Limited came with a 3.92 and honestly I'm currently averaging 21mpg in the city and its not too bad for me. Im sure if i commute more on the freeway it would be better, but i figure, it comes with a good 8speed trans so it shouldn't be that bad in mpg.
Ramvia is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #22 of 23 Old 04-20-2016, 09:57 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I know this is a late response but I figured it could help someone out in the future. I have the 3.92 and my dad has the 3.55. He can average about 24mpg with normal city/hwy mix driving while I do roughly 21mpg. I've driven his truck quite a bit and am able to get the same mpg in his truck that he does so I can conclude our driving habits are similar. As for towing capacity, all trucks are engineered with safety ratios in towing capacity. Just because it says 8.5k towing capacity does not mean it cannot do more. It is simply not recommended. However, safety factors often decrease load ratings quite a bit. Just cause you are near or over 1000 lbs of the stated tow capacity does not mean you are near an unsafe tow capacity.

We towed a small trailer with a 2wd frontier that was loaded with vinyl plank. This load was well over the towing capacity of the truck (it was a one time tow). The truck held up well even though it struggled slightly, in the end it was the trailer that ended up giving in haha (blowout).

My recommendation to anyone pondering the same question is to go with the 3.55. It is far more than what your typical loads require (boat, atvs, construction materials for DIY projects) and it is worth the better mpgs.
MCios24 is offline  
post #23 of 23 Old 11-29-2018, 02:46 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
3.55 vs. 3.92 - MPG vs. Towing Ability

I have the EcoDiesel with 3.55 Axle Ratio. When I'm towing heavier loads +6000 lbs the transmission never shift beyond 6-7 gear @ 65 mph.
The 3.55 is limited to 7750 lbs and the 3.92 to 8750 (quad cab)

Why does it matter if the engine is spinning at 65 mph @ 1808 (3.92+ 8 gear) vs. 2059 (3.55 + 7 gear)

Unfortunately there is no direct RPM match for different gears between 3.55 and 3.92 (see attachment)

Basically there is always a gear to fit RPM and speed so why not stick to the 3.55 and why is the towing weight different?
I don't think ZF makes the lower gears less durable than the 8th gear since when towing the engine never reaches 8th gear.
I'm not to worried about the MPG when towing.
Attached Images
File Type: bmp Laptop_867.bmp (402.9 KB, 73 views)
File Type: bmp Laptop_868.bmp (943.8 KB, 134 views)
Ecodiesel2016 is offline  
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thinking of bying ram ecodiesel anyone have towing mpg's Kaine Ram 1500 EcoDiesel General Discussion 27 06-18-2016 12:54 PM
Official 2014 Ram 1500 MPG rating = 28 MPG Panther Dash Ram 1500 EcoDiesel Mileage Chatter 15 12-11-2014 12:40 PM
RAM 1500 EcoDiesel Review: Towing and MPG Accused Ram 1500 EcoDiesel General Discussion 8 11-20-2013 02:22 PM

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome